Font and Timeline; the “C” is not an AA 757 C and the fuselage piece was not there before the afternoon. 911 was an inside crime. The only thing real on 911 was TV fakery. Everything else we were shown on TV was false. Thanks and a tip of our hat to Joe Craine, YouTube martyr. …
Sure he did. and I Read the post before you edited it
Simple explanation…the two sets of pictures are taken HOURS apart. Notice the sunshine on the face of the building in the early shot, and long shadows on the later shot. Yes..its an obvious conspiracy. NOT!
petetheheat19
You got me. I have no idea what you mean? We know that there was no airplane debris at 10:06 and we know that the FOX reporter lied about seeing debris.
We know that the images shown as airplane debris are not offical and have no fides.
What’s your point?
You cops at least plant/drop stuff at the time of the crime – usually.
Yep but your own misrepresentation of the reconstruction photos refute nothing
Furthermore, You are using fallacies of relevance to support you fallacious augment in every topic espoused by you and your 911truth group.
The 911truth groups utilize Classic ilustrative fallacy families: Appeal to authority, Appeal to tradition, Appeal to fear
,Appeal to flattery,Special pleading,
Appeal to ignorance,Begging the question,
Appeal to personal attack,Straw man attack
Red herring,Appeal to personal attack,Two wrongs make a right. This indicates your groups arguments are fiction
well they left a thee foot gash on both sides and the tanks exploded and sent shrpnel as far as washington avenue the engins penetrated into the building it was not reinforced to take a side impact.
I know what hit the pentagon was a 757 and that the hole in c ring was aresult of rescue efforts. You simply have to look at the First responders there and thoes whom were in clear view of the incident. Not a single one says it was a missile. The say it was like one.
So good ol’ Hani Saleh Hanjour who could barely fly ANYthing is suddenly negotiating a 757 w/all of it’s automated systems & hi-tech instrumentation at top speeds only feet off the ground whilst under duress & clipping light poles along the way. Should have blamed the poles on wake turbulance but there goes the silly notion that a 757 could fly anywhere near that fast that close to the ground! So he’s clipping those poles with the most crucial part of the plane for control, yet no probs… LOL!
carnivoreeschelon
You already said that with equal eloquence and ESL skill.
Yep if a 17 yer old can use flight simulator to prove you wrong and then show films
of low passes of 757s at training.Besides the fact your quote is from cnn not the flight instructor at Huffman Texas. Thanks for anothe underqualified opinion
You’re welcome.
CarnivoreEschelon
This video addesses planted evidence and not missiles.
Please stick to the subject or get deleted. There are loads of videos dealing with subjects you might wish to discuss; discuss your issues on them.
Trolling on my boards is discouraged.
bollocks ..you are a zionist agent …a missile hit the pentagon period.
So the truth is a troll. Interesting, Hitler made the same ploy when talking about disinformation and those whom choose to believe it.
The same lack of eloquence in your Crime scene or aircraft crash scene investigation skills your lack of forensic training is very obvious in your videos. They a illustration of ignorance of the physical evidence at hand and your deceptive nature. Distraction of the ignorant is a known tacit of a used car salesman.
Somebody needs to figure out that when you shoot an image of a curved surface, the features will be distorted.
This was such an elementary mistake I had to watch twice to be sure what you’re even trying to tell us.
As for the second part, again, it’s very hard to figure out what you’re trying to say, but you’re making an obvious implication that no-one could’ve moved that part of aluminum because it was in the way of the rescue efforts. Quite preposterus, obviously, and it shows nothing.
Is it my imagination that when the “C” shows up, the glass panes in several of the windows of that little “flight tower” disappear?
nameofthepen
Nice catch. I thinnk you are right. No windows were broken in the official story (that I remember)!
Those are definitely covered.
CNNFakes…
These pictures are obviously from different times of the day. The firefighters and clean up units moved the debris to the side for examination of the evidence. Objects of evidence don’t really do anybody any good stuck in the side of a building, do they now?
So lemmy get this straight, a government or inside agency plans the biggest terrorist attack on US soil… and when planting the evidence they put the wrong font on the debris?
Try swinging your investigative instincts onto these little enigmas:
Who was the former FBI expert on Bin Laden and what job did he start on that day?
So, someone moved the part there at some point during the day. All that means is that the it did not land their initially, it’s not proof that it was “planted” at the scene.
And the fonts do look the same to me.
(Also, for future reference, showing the same image twice does not constitute a new piece of evidence, one yellow circle with a pan and zoom is enough to establish you point.)
Do ya think twisted wreckage might make a font look different. But that peice of metal sure got moved around a lot unless of course it was just photoshopped into various photos and those doing it bdid not realize where the other photoshopper had placed it.
i think it was the letter “S”….you know?….from a “missle”………missles always has letters on them
hmm good quwstion, from “m” or “n”, too small on “c”, and too thin, letters on aircraft more lightly are made bold from it, compare the size of the letter to the window size of the aircraft and to Ford beside
I also have questioned the “c” plane part….where is the rest of the plane? the bodies? luggage?…makes no sense..