Sponsor: PatriotInternet.com – After grabbing twelve horses from a Candia, New Hampshire homeowner…SPCA operatives ignore my request to see and videotape the horses. This vid was first shot and produced in early 2009. Video of raid shot by horse owner Brian Travis: www.youtube.com Tobuy an ad… like the one in this vid….email me: RidleyReport at live…. period com. Ad rate details: nhunderground.com RidleyReport name of advertiser dave ridley report ron paul raid dogs cats peta treatment of animals nh free state project libertarian new hampshire cooper travis liberty forum john stossel secession bureaucrat thugs states’ rights states us constitution nhspce steve sprowl brian travis porcupine david nwo first amendment right to record videotape politics rebellion political porcupines amendment anarchist v for vendetta second american revolution tyrrany thomas jefferson anarchism anarchy opppose stop new world order campaign for liberty dollar resistance protest demonstration demonstrators civil war opponents protesters alex jones police abuse cops mall cop taser wiretapping law ron paul new hampshire brian travis raid horses nhspca spca free state project peta animal cruelty welfare horses animal cruelty prevention of cruelty to animals society for the tazer don’t taze me bro dont war on drugs barry cooper prison jail intimidation amnesty international kop busters blue light gang human rights watch crime department …. Please thank our sponsor by visiting …
What about those who really ARE guilty though?
Is a mass murderer’s home also sacrosanct?
What about terrorists?
Child abductors?
you’re saying we don’t allow the law to pursue these people because it encroaches on their freedoms?
No answer?
No. If a mass murderer’s location is known, and enough evidence exists, a warrant is obtained “by oath or affirmation”, as per the 4th Amendment. The 4th Amendment protects the innocent from government encroachment and abuse. Was it Madison who stated long ago that, “Our Constitution is meant for a moral peoples only. It is entirely unfit for any other.” ? I can’t remember if it was Madison, or Adams.
So why is it OK for a mass murderer’s home to be searched but not someone who is neglecting horses?
Both are innocent until proven guilty, right?
I don’t see anything within the context of the 4th Amendment that protects horses, or domestic animals. Are you saying domestic animals have the same rights, and protections, that the Citizens do?
New Hampshire has specific laws covering animal cruelty which it considers a felony. Failing to provide adequate shelter for horses is a criminal offense under NH law. Hardly a “victimless crime” either.
The Candia PD are investigating criminal activity and have “probable cause”.
So how has the spirit or letter of the US Constitution been violated here?
“So how has the spirit or letter of the US Constitution been violated here?”…. Again, there is no mention of domestic animals within the text of the 4th Amendment. Any attempt to cover domestic animals under the 4th Amendment would be post-defacto, thus making it illegal. I realize that many states have passed laws to protect animals, and some are very well received. I like animals myself. Should we allow the government to use an alibi as this to circumvent the 4th Amendment?
The 4th is about what constitutes a reasonable and lawful search of property, REGARDLESS of what is being searched for – and I think you know that.
let’s do a checklist shall we?
“…no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause [CHECK], supported by Oath or affirmation[CHECK], and particularly describing the place to be searched [CHECK], and the persons or things to be seized [CHECK]
So again…how has the spirit or the letter of the US Constitution been violated here?
Okay. I can see you’ve done your homework, which is good. I suppose the crux of the issue is the domestic animals. I find it difficult to believe that the Framers would include domestic animals as something they’d want Warrants to be issued for. Non-the-less, modern legislators have heaped laws on top of laws to benefit Trial Lawyers, and/or certain ideologies. So, what’s next? Issuance of Warrants for torn furniture? After all, insects can breed in furniture. It could be considered “hazardous”.
then your issue is with the NH legislators, not the judges and especially not the cops.
I suppose you’re right. The NH Legislators are largely to blame for being manipulated, and lobbied by, animal rights groups. Cops only follow orders, which is drastically different from years back when cops “did the right thing”. But, why are the judges rubber stamping these warrants? Where’s the NH Supreme Court on this issue? I think they’re more concerned about keeping full calenders, no matter what each case might be.
People if you dont wake up and fight the new laws they can come after your pets.HSUS ,SPCA is on a roll passing more laws that give them more rights and take owners rights away.Check you state for Bills they are pushing to do this.This is serious for any animal owner.They lie to get these laws they want to abolish animals and force us to be vegans.
Because lack of evidence is not evidence. I agree these people are morons. I do not agree that someone driving down the road who thinks you might be a criminal can just invade your home and property.
If there was a starving horse then it would be evidence.
If the police drive by your home and see a child in your home, but they don’t see a parent, can they search your home without a warrant? No, because not seeing a parent doesn’t mean there isn’t one.
that’s what warrants are for, right? A third party deciding if there is reasonable cause to enter a property.
Exactly, we have these processes because a handful of very intelligent Christians, Militants and Skirt chasers sat down and spent allot of time figuring out how to protect themselves from a government created by themselves…LOL
presumably you’ve seen the latest videos concerning this lot…
I watched a few of the ridleyreport videos but got annoyed real quick. Couldn’t find a connecting video but it seems the Travis family had their horses seized because they failed to provide shelter for them. They apparently lied to the SPCA and POLICE while being lied to by the SPCA and POLICE. I got the feeling from the vid that if they had been honest they’d still have their horses. I’m speculating though since I couldn’t find the linking video covering the actual seizure.
“I got the feeling from the vid that if they had been honest they’d still have their horses.”
That’s about the size of it. If you go to war with the authorities like this then you either need to be in compliance 110% or else have a wad of cash to spend on lawyers. Unfortunately they weren’t and they didn’t.
Amusingly there were quite a few of the “burn the cops and hang the judges” brigade who crossed the floor once the details of the Travis’s and their exploits came to light.
I love the stupidity of the SPCA. shelter? for horses? well if they could take these horses because of lack of shelter they better get heir butts north of frt. st. john BC Canada. there are quite a few wild horses out there and i highly doubt they have any shelter and i guarentee it gets a lot colder there than it ever will in new hampshire. they are animals and if fed proper can survive quite well without shelter. and what about the dear? and moose? those poor little rabits and foxes..
Nowhere in this report do they allege there is no shelter. We can see shelter in the video. Rather, they found missing paperwork, according to the audio.
If you watch the first video in the series, the caretaker explains to the SPCA that there is shelter, but it can’t be seen from the road. Since the property owner isn’t there, they are told they need a warrant. Apparently the horses are seized because they don’t want to get a warrant and then have nothing to show for it.
Spca, humane society suck. The video of the travs horse shelter that I did see here looked like some one should have spent a 8 hr with a bobcat and clean it up. There was no video of what the horse looked like. Video was dark and there was not detail. To me it looked like they were hiding some thing. That may have been the idiot that was operating the video.
No offense to anyone … but this is nothing … wait till they try … or do … take away your children over BS!
Thankfull Mother of two SURVIVORS of 6 … yes 6! attempts by thier schools to rid themselves of “problem parents” (translation > parent who advocate pationatly for their children) by getting them removed and fostered in anothe school district.
The NHSPCA is non-profit they don’t use any of your tax dollars. I work at the nhspca and those people were ridiculous. The weather at the time the horses were rescued was a blizzard and not all of them had shelter and blankets. A few of the horses I saw from there were too thin to be able to be safe in that kind of winter weather. The NHSPCA doesn’t even have the money or space to take in horses that don’t really need help. It’s sad that they are being made to look bad for trying to help.
@ShawnananaVan – I totally disagree with your comments here. I did not see any of those horses too thin! I also have horses & have seen with my own 2 eyes, my horse standing outside in freezing temps with icicles hanging off her stomach! She HAD shelter to go into on her own doing if she chose to do so. I do Not agree with locking any animal up inside! My vet also tells me horses kept up in barns are usually More inclined as “problem horses”!
@no4go2 – I have horses and am in virginia. I have witnessed a horse of mine stand outside in 1 spot so long that icicles actually formed under her belly. She HAD shelter to get into, she Chose Not to go into the shelter. I totally agree with your comments. Just goes to show how Ignorant these people of today truly are! So many uninformed dumb asses all over this World are the true problems of this world!