Wikileaks may not be what you think it is, commentary by Fractured.Facade

Wikileaks may not be what you think it is…

Topic started on 6-4-2010 @ 09:49 PM by Fractured.Facade

image Please note that I am only speculating here based on my recent personal experience.

I have some material that I may be interested in having published, and made public at some point. After seeing the successful publishing of the recent Iraq video I thought this could be an opportunity I hadn’t considered.

I can’t discus that material now, so please don’t ask.

Using s secure computer at a secure location I used this contact/submission form……

I sent two files, a very brief edited video, and a text file.

Almost immediately the computer
I was using froze up, and after giving up was forced to shut down.

Then I began to wonder, the recent video release, everything we know about wikileaks… And what we don’t know.

What if this is all a scam to get people who may have sensitive or secret information to send it in?

They couldn’t have set a better trap, if that is the case.

It all seems a bit too convenient to me now, and I can think of no better way that the intelligence community could set up a front to attract people with information the government wants eliminated or suppressed.

Maybe this was all staged to accomplish that goal?

Maybe wikileaks isn’t what we think it is.

There is too much we don’t know, and in my case that is disappointing, and a bit worrisome. If I had sent more than the 2 files I did, I would be even more worried.

What do you think of the possibilities here?

[edit on 6-4-2010 by Fractured.Facade]


reply posted on 6-4-2010 @ 09:57 PM by darrman 

Hmmm made me think…

i remember a “pawn shop” that was run by A local police dept. and the word on the street was “it was a GREAT place to go..
Funny thing was they NEVER had anything to sell.. only bought things,, until……

Very interesting!! 
reply posted on 6-4-2010 @ 09:58 PM by alaskan 
“Wiki” just doesn’t sound too trustworthy to me, but we’ll have to wait and see if people start disappearing…

reply posted on 6-4-2010 @ 09:59 PM by UfoSpecial 

This certainly would be a valid concern to have. If it was me I sure would not want to be getting caught for releasing certain info to an undercover intel group.
Having sensitive stuff and wanting to divulge it would make any normal person a bit paranoid at the least.
With all the different countries showing real anger about wikileaks, and censoring them, I am 99.9% sure they are really legit and not some government skunks, but I could be wrong.

reply posted on 6-4-2010 @ 10:11 PM by Fractured.Facade 
From the submission page for those who may not bother to click the link…

WikiLeaks accepts classified, censored or otherwise restricted material of political, diplomatic or ethical significance.
WikiLeaks does not accept rumour, opinion or other kinds of first hand reporting or material that is already publicly available.

If your submission matches this criteria we will publish and keep published the document you submitted. The information you submit will be technically anonymized and we do not retain any information on you. We will never cooperate with anyone seeking to identify you.

And the very first thing you see (Top of the page) on wikilinks home page…


Click here to make a secure submission

Which will take you to this form……

Very enticing… almost got me.


[edit on 6-4-2010 by Fractured.Facade] 

image reply posted on 6-4-2010 @ 10:11 PM by 517.101 
+11 more 

I read your thread And I thought,

HMMMMMM, disinformation.

Seriously, George bush would be really proud of you for this one. 

reply posted on 6-4-2010 @ 10:18 PM by muzzleflash 

Check out the thread I made on this very topic.

There is some good replies in there too!…

“Is WikiLeaks a TPTB Front??”

Fun discussion for sure!

Any comments I would put here would just be mostly cut+paste from that other thread.

Wikileaks a TPTB Front? I betcha it is!!! 

reply posted on 6-4-2010 @ 10:19 PM by Fractured.Facade 

reply to post by 517.101


And I could easily make the same claim about what you have just posted.

I have no agenda here, just serious questions and doubts… and I have good reason to.

If you feel wikileaks is what they are portrayed to be, have sensitive info that meets their criteria submit it to them…

What do you have to lose? 

reply posted on 6-4-2010 @ 10:21 PM by muzzleflash 


Do NOT post it on WikiLeaks!!!

You will prolly end up in Prison before anyone even sees what you are trying to leak!

Post it on ATS (or other websites like this)!!!

ATS is pretty much way safer and I personally will get to see it before it gets deleted.

ATS > WikiLeaks

[edit on 6-4-2010 by muzzleflash] 

reply posted on 6-4-2010 @ 10:24 PM by muzzleflash 

–Originally posted by 517.101 “HMMMMMM, disinformation. “–

No the disinformation has not really started yet in full force.

WikiLeaks is BUYING Credibility right now. So people will TRUST them.

Then, they will start releasing tons of fake disinfo crap. (Maybe, just a theory).

All I am saying is that we can bury WikiLeaks in conspiracy speculations. It is just too easy to speculate about it!


reply posted on 6-4-2010 @ 10:25 PM by LurkerMan also came out saying they believe wikileaks is a CIA front.

i believe cryptome. you guys can believe whatever you want.