Where will YOU draw the line? NO COMPLACENCY!
Excerpt from Michael Badnarik’s constitution class.
Where will YOU draw the line?
complacency is always dangerous. never comply to constitutional violations.
What an amazing speaker.
http://www.NewsForNatives.com
This is an excerpt from Michael Badnarik’s constitution class.
Full video available here: http://archive.org/details/Michael_Badnarik
Michael Badnarik Quotes: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/michael_badnarik.html
“Gun bans disarm victims, putting them at the mercy of murderers or terrorists who think nothing of breaking the gun laws.”
“The first lines of defense against criminals are the victims themselves.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Badnarik
The thumbnail is from the holocaustresearchproject.org and depicts an SS soldier in a concentration camp, striking a Jewish inmate who is crawling in front of him while trying to carry a block of stone on his shoulders.
image available here http://tiny.cc/ss_jew_stone
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
I understand but you do not seem to get what I am saying and only seem to be addressing one part of my statements. I can not source a book I had in my possession YEARS AGO that I have not seen in all that time. I also gave you another way to assess the standing information and no one seems to have the mental fortitude to check into it. I have been through this and much more in posts on this very page and refuse to waste time with someone who can not read the standing convo
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons??  of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …
are you sure, you can’t restrict bazookas, tanks, nuclear weapons?? of course you can.. then again, if the gov’t has drones , we should be able to arm ourselves with the same …