Where will YOU draw the line? NO COMPLACENCY!
Excerpt from Michael Badnarik’s constitution class.
Where will YOU draw the line?
complacency is always dangerous. never comply to constitutional violations.
What an amazing speaker.
http://www.NewsForNatives.com
This is an excerpt from Michael Badnarik’s constitution class.
Full video available here: http://archive.org/details/Michael_Badnarik
Michael Badnarik Quotes: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/michael_badnarik.html
“Gun bans disarm victims, putting them at the mercy of murderers or terrorists who think nothing of breaking the gun laws.”
“The first lines of defense against criminals are the victims themselves.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Badnarik
The thumbnail is from the holocaustresearchproject.org and depicts an SS soldier in a concentration camp, striking a Jewish inmate who is crawling in front of him while trying to carry a block of stone on his shoulders.
image available here http://tiny.cc/ss_jew_stone
Nice speech but as with the Jews, people are afraid and all power is maintained through fear and there is lack of organisation of people to make a difference. Just look on the internet and read such posts as these on here. Many people are angry, they can see liberty being taken away but there is no organisation to bring those people together. Strength in numbers but the numbers are scattered and afraid. An ideal environment for tyranty to develop.
Nice speech but as with the Jews, people are afraid and all power is maintained through fear and there is lack of organisation of people to make a difference. Just look on the internet and read such posts as these on here. Many people are angry, they can see liberty being taken away but there is no organisation to bring those people together. Strength in numbers but the numbers are scattered and afraid. An ideal environment for tyranty to develop.
Nice speech but as with the Jews, people are afraid and all power is maintained through fear and there is lack of organisation of people to make a difference. Just look on the internet and read such posts as these on here. Many people are angry, they can see liberty being taken away but there is no organisation to bring those people together. Strength in numbers but the numbers are scattered and afraid. An ideal environment for tyranty to develop.
Nice speech but as with the Jews, people are afraid and all power is maintained through fear and there is lack of organisation of people to make a difference. Just look on the internet and read such posts as these on here. Many people are angry, they can see liberty being taken away but there is no organisation to bring those people together. Strength in numbers but the numbers are scattered and afraid. An ideal environment for tyranty to develop.
Nice speech but as with the Jews, people are afraid and all power is maintained through fear and there is lack of organisation of people to make a difference. Just look on the internet and read such posts as these on here. Many people are angry, they can see liberty being taken away but there is no organisation to bring those people together. Strength in numbers but the numbers are scattered and afraid. An ideal environment for tyranty to develop.
Nice speech but as with the Jews, people are afraid and all power is maintained through fear and there is lack of organisation of people to make a difference. Just look on the internet and read such posts as these on here. Many people are angry, they can see liberty being taken away but there is no organisation to bring those people together. Strength in numbers but the numbers are scattered and afraid. An ideal environment for tyranty to develop.
Nice speech but as with the Jews, people are afraid and all power is maintained through fear and there is lack of organisation of people to make a difference. Just look on the internet and read such posts as these on here. Many people are angry, they can see liberty being taken away but there is no organisation to bring those people together. Strength in numbers but the numbers are scattered and afraid. An ideal environment for tyranty to develop.
Dude, all you did was cut and paste your reply verbatim. All laws can be amended or repealed.
Dude, all you did was cut and paste your reply verbatim. All laws can be amended or repealed.
Dude, all you did was cut and paste your reply verbatim. All laws can be amended or repealed.
Dude, all you did was cut and paste your reply verbatim. All laws can be amended or repealed.
Dude, all you did was cut and paste your reply verbatim. All laws can be amended or repealed.
Dude, all you did was cut and paste your reply verbatim.  All laws can be amended or repealed.
Dude, all you did was cut and paste your reply verbatim. All laws can be amended or repealed.
Dude, all you did was cut and paste your reply verbatim. All laws can be amended or repealed. 
Just looking at certain codes: Is this what you’re talking about?
California 25850 exceptions for militia members via 26000 and 10 USC 311 and 32 USC 313
Doesn’t that make me a State military member of the unorganized militia until I’m 64?
Isn’t doing my official duties being ready to respond to incidents with my militia weapon which I’m carrying on my hip loaded in plain view?
Just looking at certain codes: Is this what you’re talking about?
California 25850 exceptions for militia members via 26000 and 10 USC 311 and 32 USC 313
Doesn’t that make me a State military member of the unorganized militia until I’m 64?
Isn’t doing my official duties being ready to respond to incidents with my militia weapon which I’m carrying on my hip loaded in plain view?
Just looking at certain codes: Is this what you’re talking about?
California 25850 exceptions for militia members via 26000 and 10 USC 311 and 32 USC 313
Doesn’t that make me a State military member of the unorganized militia until I’m 64?
Isn’t doing my official duties being ready to respond to incidents with my militia weapon which I’m carrying on my hip loaded in plain view?
Just looking at certain codes: Is this what you’re talking about?
California 25850 exceptions for militia members via 26000 and 10 USC 311 and 32 USC 313
Doesn’t that make me a State military member of the unorganized militia until I’m 64?
Isn’t doing my official duties being ready to respond to incidents with my militia weapon which I’m carrying on my hip loaded in plain view?
Just looking at certain codes: Is this what you’re talking about?
California 25850 exceptions for militia members via 26000 and 10 USC 311 and 32 USC 313
Doesn’t that make me a State military member of the unorganized militia until I’m 64?
Isn’t doing my official duties being ready to respond to incidents with my militia weapon which I’m carrying on my hip loaded in plain view?
Just looking at certain codes: Is this what you’re talking about?
California 25850 exceptions for militia members via 26000 and 10 USC 311 and 32 USC 313
Doesn’t that make me a State military member of the unorganized militia until I’m 64?
Isn’t doing my official duties being ready to respond to incidents with my militia weapon which I’m carrying on my hip loaded in plain view?
Just looking at certain codes: Is this what you’re talking about?
California 25850 exceptions for militia members via 26000 and 10 USC 311 and 32 USC 313
Doesn’t that make me a State military member of the unorganized militia until I’m 64?
Isn’t doing my official duties being ready to respond to incidents with my militia weapon which I’m carrying on my hip loaded in plain view?
Just looking at certain codes: Is this what you’re talking about?
California 25850 exceptions for militia members via 26000 and 10 USC 311 and 32 USC 313
Doesn’t that make me a State military member of the unorganized militia until I’m 64?
Isn’t doing my official duties being ready to respond to incidents with my militia weapon which I’m carrying on my hip loaded in plain view?
Just looking at certain codes: Is this what you’re talking about?
California 25850 exceptions for militia members via 26000 and 10 USC 311 and 32 USC 313
Doesn’t that make me a State military member of the unorganized militia until I’m 64?
Isn’t doing my official duties being ready to respond to incidents with my militia weapon which I’m carrying on my hip loaded in plain view?
Just looking at certain codes: Is this what you’re talking about?
California 25850 exceptions for militia members via 26000 and 10 USC 311 and 32 USC 313
Doesn’t that make me a State military member of the unorganized militia until I’m 64?
Isn’t doing my official duties being ready to respond to incidents with my militia weapon which I’m carrying on my hip loaded in plain view?
tnks bastard
The Dick Act cannot be repealed
You are an deluded fuck. The Dick act keeps the National Guard under federal control. Any act can be repealed, how fucking stupid of you. Oh fucketyfuck.
You are an deluded fuck. The Dick act keeps the National Guard under federal control.  Any act can be repealed, how fucking stupid of you. Oh fucketyfuck.
You are an deluded fuck. The Dick act keeps the National Guard under federal control. Any act can be repealed, how fucking stupid of you. Oh fucketyfuck.
You are an deluded fuck. The Dick act keeps the National Guard under federal control. Any act can be repealed, how fucking stupid of you. Oh fucketyfuck.
You are an deluded fuck. The Dick act keeps the National Guard under federal control.  Any act can be repealed, how fucking stupid of you. Oh fucketyfuck.
You are an deluded fuck. The Dick act keeps the National Guard under federal control. Any act can be repealed, how fucking stupid of you.  Oh fucketyfuck.
Natural rights are inherent, simply by virtue of being born. That’s why they are birthrights.
Natural rights are inherent, simply by virtue of being born. That’s why they are birthrights.
Natural rights are inherent, simply by virtue of being born. That’s why they are birthrights.
Natural rights are inherent, simply by virtue of being born. That’s why they are birthrights.
then in 1932 they banned all automatic weapons.
then in 1932 they banned all automatic weapons.
then in 1932 they banned all automatic weapons.
He means we have Inalienable rights, not Constitutional rights.
He means we have Inalienable rights, not Constitutional rights.
He means we have Inalienable rights, not Constitutional rights.
He means we have Inalienable rights, not Constitutional rights.
I agree with what Michael Badnarik is sharing, however I am uncertain as to why he states that claiming Constitutional Rights is irrelevant (another video from an earlier point in this very presentation) and then begins quoting Abraham Lincoln’s statement about Constitutional Rights. Can someone please assist with an explanation? Thank you!
I agree with what Michael Badnarik is sharing, however I am uncertain as to why he states that claiming Constitutional Rights is irrelevant (another video from an earlier point in this very presentation) and then begins quoting Abraham Lincoln’s statement about Constitutional Rights. Can someone please assist with an explanation? Thank you!
I agree with what Michael Badnarik is sharing, however I am uncertain as to why he states that claiming Constitutional Rights is irrelevant (another video from an earlier point in this very presentation) and then begins quoting Abraham Lincoln’s statement about Constitutional Rights. Can someone please assist with an explanation? Thank you!
I agree with what Michael Badnarik is sharing, however I am uncertain as to why he states that claiming Constitutional Rights is irrelevant (another video from an earlier point in this very presentation) and then begins quoting Abraham Lincoln’s statement about Constitutional Rights. Can someone please assist with an explanation? Thank you!
I agree with what Michael Badnarik is sharing, however I am uncertain as to why he states that claiming Constitutional Rights is irrelevant (another video from an earlier point in this very presentation) and then begins quoting Abraham Lincoln’s statement about Constitutional Rights. Can someone please assist with an explanation? Thank you!
I agree with what Michael Badnarik is sharing, however I am uncertain as to why he states that claiming Constitutional Rights is irrelevant (another video from an earlier point in this very presentation) and then begins quoting Abraham Lincoln’s statement about Constitutional Rights. Can someone please assist with an explanation? Thank you!
I agree with what Michael Badnarik is sharing, however I am uncertain as to why he states that claiming Constitutional Rights is irrelevant (another video from an earlier point in this very presentation) and then begins quoting Abraham Lincoln’s statement about Constitutional Rights. Can someone please assist with an explanation? Thank you!