Where will YOU draw the line? NO COMPLACENCY!
Excerpt from Michael Badnarik’s constitution class.
Where will YOU draw the line?
complacency is always dangerous. never comply to constitutional violations.
What an amazing speaker.
http://www.NewsForNatives.com
This is an excerpt from Michael Badnarik’s constitution class.
Full video available here: http://archive.org/details/Michael_Badnarik
Michael Badnarik Quotes: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/michael_badnarik.html
“Gun bans disarm victims, putting them at the mercy of murderers or terrorists who think nothing of breaking the gun laws.”
“The first lines of defense against criminals are the victims themselves.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Badnarik
The thumbnail is from the holocaustresearchproject.org and depicts an SS soldier in a concentration camp, striking a Jewish inmate who is crawling in front of him while trying to carry a block of stone on his shoulders.
image available here http://tiny.cc/ss_jew_stone
I agree with what Michael Badnarik is sharing, however I am uncertain as to why he states that claiming Constitutional Rights is irrelevant (another video from an earlier point in this very presentation) and then begins quoting Abraham Lincoln’s statement about Constitutional Rights. Can someone please assist with an explanation? Thank you!
2ND AMENDMENT
You can’t restrict weapons in Amerika. In 1902 our Congress addressed the 2nd Amendment. They passed HR11654 The Efficiency of Militia Bill also called the Dick Act of 1902, invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
2ND AMENDMENT
You can’t restrict weapons in Amerika. In 1902 our Congress addressed the 2nd Amendment. They passed HR11654 The Efficiency of Militia Bill also called the Dick Act of 1902, invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
2ND AMENDMENT
You can’t restrict weapons in Amerika. In 1902 our Congress addressed the 2nd Amendment. They passed HR11654 The Efficiency of Militia Bill also called the Dick Act of 1902, invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
2ND AMENDMENT
You can’t restrict weapons in Amerika. In 1902 our Congress addressed the 2nd Amendment. They passed HR11654 The Efficiency of Militia Bill also called the Dick Act of 1902, invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
2ND AMENDMENT
You can’t restrict weapons in Amerika. In 1902 our Congress addressed the 2nd Amendment. They passed HR11654 The Efficiency of Militia Bill also called the Dick Act of 1902, invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
2ND AMENDMENT
You can’t restrict weapons in Amerika. In 1902 our Congress addressed the 2nd Amendment. They passed HR11654 The Efficiency of Militia Bill also called the Dick Act of 1902, invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
2ND AMENDMENT
You can’t restrict weapons in Amerika. In 1902 our Congress addressed the 2nd Amendment. They passed HR11654 The Efficiency of Militia Bill also called the Dick Act of 1902, invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
2ND AMENDMENT
You can’t restrict weapons in Amerika. In 1902 our Congress addressed the 2nd Amendment. They passed HR11654 The Efficiency of Militia Bill also called the Dick Act of 1902, invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
2ND AMENDMENT
You can’t restrict weapons in Amerika. In 1902 our Congress addressed the 2nd Amendment. They passed HR11654 The Efficiency of Militia Bill also called the Dick Act of 1902, invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
2ND AMENDMENT
You can’t restrict weapons in Amerika. In 1902 our Congress addressed the 2nd Amendment. They passed HR11654 The Efficiency of Militia Bill also called the Dick Act of 1902, invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
And now it is the media treating the NRA, gun owners and believers of the Constitution, Liberty and Freedom as criminals and terrorists. The media are the real terrorist here, turning the citizens of the USA against each other. Media should be tried for treason against the American people.
And now it is the media treating the NRA, gun owners and believers of the Constitution, Liberty and Freedom as criminals and terrorists. The media are the real terrorist here, turning the citizens of the USA against each other. Media should be tried for treason against the American people.
And now it is the media treating the NRA, gun owners and believers of the Constitution, Liberty and Freedom as criminals and terrorists. The media are the real terrorist here, turning the citizens of the USA against each other. Media should be tried for treason against the American people.
And now it is the media treating the NRA, gun owners and believers of the Constitution, Liberty and Freedom as criminals and terrorists. The media are the real terrorist here, turning the citizens of the USA against each other. Media should be tried for treason against the American people.
And now it is the media treating the NRA, gun owners and believers of the Constitution, Liberty and Freedom as criminals and terrorists. The media are the real terrorist here, turning the citizens of the USA against each other. Media should be tried for treason against the American people.
And now it is the media treating the NRA, gun owners and believers of the Constitution, Liberty and Freedom as criminals and terrorists. The media are the real terrorist here, turning the citizens of the USA against each other. Media should be tried for treason against the American people.
And now it is the media treating the NRA, gun owners and believers of the Constitution, Liberty and Freedom as criminals and terrorists. The media are the real terrorist here, turning the citizens of the USA against each other. Media should be tried for treason against the American people.
And now it is the media treating the NRA, gun owners and believers of the Constitution, Liberty and Freedom as criminals and terrorists. The media are the real terrorist here, turning the citizens of the USA against each other. Media should be tried for treason against the American people.
And now it is the media treating the NRA, gun owners and believers of the Constitution, Liberty and Freedom as criminals and terrorists. The media are the real terrorist here, turning the citizens of the USA against each other. Media should be tried for treason against the American people.
jews are not a race, but humans are.
jews are not a race, but humans are.
jews are not a race, but humans are.
jews are not a race, but humans are.
well then, I’m saying it didn’t happen…. you’re just giving misinformation… my contention is the Aliens did it.. my proof is that I’m on the internet, I say so, and its fact now…there…
well then, I’m saying it didn’t happen…. you’re just giving misinformation… my contention is the Aliens did it.. my proof is that I’m on the internet, I say so, and its fact now…there…
well then, I’m saying it didn’t happen…. you’re just giving misinformation… my contention is the Aliens did it.. my proof is that I’m on the internet, I say so, and its fact now…there…
well then, I’m saying it didn’t happen…. you’re just giving misinformation… my contention is the Aliens did it.. my proof is that I’m on the internet, I say so, and its fact now…there…
well then, I’m saying it didn’t happen…. you’re just giving misinformation… my contention is the Aliens did it.. my proof is that I’m on the internet, I say so, and its fact now…there…
well then, I’m saying it didn’t happen…. you’re just giving misinformation… my contention is the Aliens did it.. my proof is that I’m on the internet, I say so, and its fact now…there…
well then, I’m saying it didn’t happen…. you’re just giving misinformation… my contention is the Aliens did it.. my proof is that I’m on the internet, I say so, and its fact now…there…
well then, I’m saying it didn’t happen…. you’re just giving misinformation… my contention is the Aliens did it.. my proof is that I’m on the internet, I say so, and its fact now…there…
Again you misquote me. I did not say that. Read it again. anyways, my half drunk ars can have spelling issues without losing the intended integrity of the sentence. You understood my point and that is all that truely matters here! Most people know why others hang on the spelling in such situations, right?
Again you misquote me. I did not say that. Read it again. anyways, my half drunk ars can have spelling issues without losing the intended integrity of the sentence. You understood my point and that is all that truely matters here! Most people know why others hang on the spelling in such situations, right?
Again you misquote me. I did not say that. Read it again. anyways, my half drunk ars can have spelling issues without losing the intended integrity of the sentence. You understood my point and that is all that truely matters here! Most people know why others hang on the spelling in such situations, right?
Again you misquote me. I did not say that. Read it again. anyways, my half drunk ars can have spelling issues without losing the intended integrity of the sentence. You understood my point and that is all that truely matters here! Most people know why others hang on the spelling in such situations, right?
Again you misquote me. I did not say that. Read it again. anyways, my half drunk ars can have spelling issues without losing the intended integrity of the sentence. You understood my point and that is all that truely matters here! Most people know why others hang on the spelling in such situations, right?
Again you misquote me. I did not say that. Read it again. anyways, my half drunk ars can have spelling issues without losing the intended integrity of the sentence. You understood my point and that is all that truely matters here! Most people know why others hang on the spelling in such situations, right?
Considering that both “claimed to be a history professor at Yale” and “This includes a history professor at Yale.” are both word for word quotes, one can see how I may confuse your intent….
Considering that both “claimed to be a history professor at Yale” and “This includes a history professor at Yale.” are both word for word quotes, one can see how I may confuse your intent….
Considering that both “claimed to be a history professor at Yale” and “This includes a history professor at Yale.” are both word for word quotes, one can see how I may confuse your intent….
Considering that both “claimed to be a history professor at Yale” and “This includes a history professor at Yale.” are both word for word quotes, one can see how I may confuse your intent….
Considering that both “claimed to be a history professor at Yale” and “This includes a history professor at Yale.” are both word for word quotes, one can see how I may confuse your intent….
That is not what I was doing…..I simply didn’t feel the need to have to repeat myself about it. Glad to see that we are on the same page now…..I have respect for you even though you made an incorrect statement…haha
That is not what I was doing…..I simply didn’t feel the need to have to repeat myself about it.  Glad to see that we are on the same page now…..I have respect for you even though you made an incorrect statement…haha
That is not what I was doing…..I simply didn’t feel the need to have to repeat myself about it. Glad to see that we are on the same page now…..I have respect for you even though you made an incorrect statement…haha
That is not what I was doing…..I simply didn’t feel the need to have to repeat myself about it. Glad to see that we are on the same page now…..I have respect for you even though you made an incorrect statement…haha
That is not what I was doing…..I simply didn’t feel the need to have to repeat myself about it. Glad to see that we are on the same page now…..I have respect for you even though you made an incorrect statement…haha
#RONPAUL #TCOT #GOP #ElectionFraud #Constitution #Freedom #Liberty
NO, I WILL NOT COMPLY! PERIOD
What liberty is really about.