www.abovetopsecret.com – This presentation is a brief summary about the thread “UFO: Antigravity or Coandă Effect man made saucers or aircrafts?” that you could read (and see additional videos) at www.abovetopsecret.com . A PDF from this video is available here www.scribd.com . ATS it is very nice forum with lots of useful features and content, but you don’t need to register to read all the content and watch more videos also from YouTube, but if you like I welcome your comments there. You could post after a free and simple registration and for that you only need to have a valid e-mail. If it is you first time at ATS may I suggest you to read the “ATS Handbook” and start by making an introduction at “New Member Introductions” on “General & Shared Topic Discussion Forums”. For more threads on other Conspiracy, Science and Humanitarian subjects, useful information and ATS help or how to download videos go to www.abovetopsecret.com . You will find more subjects at Pegasus, here www.thelivingmoon.com . Fell free to post comments here at YouTube, because the subject is open for discussion and a nice dialogue is always instructive. If you use this video in your site, blog or forum, please post here a comment with a link, maybe other users will like to go to there. Search and Share! brotherthebig.
Wow! Deeply impressed about your knowledges in gravitational physics. Great, if you revealed details about the mentioned simplicity of gravity flux control and how you create gravitational thrust (like magnets that repel). I can assert you, we can produce
as much electrons on earth you needed for it.
If you thought rather on Cooper pairs (electron pair obeying bosonic, not fermian
statistics) then I have to disappoint you.
Qty’s are restricted to SC and similar condensed matter systems.
I’m just on to something new, well its old from Tesla’s age and Maxwell and never divulged perhaps. Electrical forces are a time derivative of momentum, see “Classical Electrodynamics” by Jackson. Mr Lyne has the air or ether filled with electrical momentum due to tiny magnetic circulations of particles. Thus suspension force independent of gravity.
I know Henry Coanda personally back in 1970 just before he died. Then back in 1984 when I was on my 2nd tour in Germany, my station was at Feucht Airfield, and I lived in Feucht. I ha a chance to see Herman Oberth, the prof. of Von Braun. Herman Oberth and Henry Coanda were both from Romania. Herman Oberth died 5 yrs later at 89. Unfortunatelly everyting is invented it turned out against the humanity
I didn’t see electrical charges indicated on any saucer designs in the video, perhaps in the other one or in an ATS discussion thread. Well I never thought I’d say there was a Static Electricity connection to anti-gravity but it may not be kid stuff any more. The Tesla mechanism: single terminal pancake coil does generate static charges. A central Tesla bulb sends electrons beamed out the top of the craft now surrounded by positive ion charges. Momentum from electrical forces is now controlled.
Amazing… perhaps we could talk? I would love to get your perspective
If you every get a chance to watch UFO’s:The Real History on History channel its covered the subject very well
Even though you know how to generate this huge amount of power “and fits inside a aircraft”,you’d need to know something more…I just can say,You and your friend Einstein are wrong…In fact,control the gravitational field is simple(like magnets that repel).The main problem of this planet now,is generation of electricity,I’m not worried about gravity…The One is consequence from another.
marcos13af, I hate to tell, but you are wrong here. Google for ‘gravitomagnetic London moment’ (Note the term ‘magnetic’ is confusing here). In a nutshell: Einsteins
gravitomagnetic moment was confirmed in the 80′ in satellite experiments. There is a possibility to amplify the very week effect, if you use condensed matter (BEC, SC, MAM, etc.) insted of ordinary matter. ARC demonstrated two years ago an increase of about 1E7 in SC Niobium. Now the thing is a matter of engineering. ;-))
marcos13af, pollution free energy generation (in what ever form you need) is NOT a technical, but a political (economical) question. E.g. Sandia developped the first working desktop sized EHT z-pinch fusion reactor delivering about 100MW electrical power. (Google for ‘+Sandia +”Linear transformer driver” +LTD’ to get all papers).
However U.S. congress lobbyist torpedoe the
project continously, since it’s very bad for
oil and coal business. Thorium technology is already dead due this. ;-))
“A rotating superconductor produces a magnetic field proportional to its angular velocity bla…bla…bla…I know that…But how can you do the right interpretation(?)if you don’t know the main principle?!I can be crazy,or not!!! Maybe I’m 10 years before everyone!!!Mr. sacha4you…
Marcos13af, you’re very quick with bla bla bla: The first derivative from angular velocity w to a reference frame of a metallic SC creates further the desired strong gravitomagnetic London moment. Since dw/dt=alfa, angular acceleration is the magic term, that creates the desired artificial gravitation vector. There is no interpretation required.
This is simply a scaled up quantum coupling effect based on condensed matter theory. (Member atoms of CM behaves like a single super atom) That’s all.
We can create artificial gravity by centrifugal force too,and I’m not doing reference about this point,but it has something familiar…Gravity is associate with electrons…Einstein worked all his life,trying to unify the whole theory,but let me ask you,why did he fail?
London Moment is like rediscover “an apple aways fall,or 1+1=2”.I prefer to understand about Thermodynamics…
I’m not trying to confront you mr. sacha4you,I only see the things different,I respect your beliefs and knowledge…
marcos13af, centripetal force (to call it right) is indeed artificial gravity. It’s a Newtonian force (Lex II F=ma) that gives NO net interaction with other systems. Non-newtonian artificial gravity interacts with other distant system (Repulsion or attraction)
Gravitomagnetic London moment is NOT a trivial thing. (Newton were terrified, when he saw, his apple can accelerate upwards). However, electrons play indeed a role in gravitation, but another you think.
2. ‘Normal’ electrons are near useless, since they obey fermionic statistics, hence they can only be energetically stable in mutual exclusive shell positions (Pauli’s exclusion principle) To make artificial gravity, you have to circumvent this barrier
by ‘turning’ electrons into bosonic state, where there can take any energetic state. Condensed matter is the magic term here. Gravitomagnetic London Moment (not to confuse with the classical magnetic London moment) uses Cooper pairs.
3. These are electron pairs in bosonic state, coupled together. This is not only a special quantum state of matter, but these electron pairs behave like super-electrons. (Read a book about CM quantum physics to learn more about) Now you can ‘amplifiy’ Einstein’s gravitomagnetic effect by a couple of
magnitudes. The exact mechnism is fully covered in EHT (Extended HEIM Theory), an incomplete, but experimentally well supported multidimensional quantum theory. Now the thing is engineerable. ;-))
Electrons are the solvent of mater…they are involved in all phases of mater(Solid,Liquid and Gaseous)…they have a crucial importance…they easily can fly free…other subatomic particle can be absorbed by a nucleus easily…
marcos13af, I can’t follow your post.
Yes, electrons are part of ordinary matter, they provide electrical neutrality to nucleii, make chemistry possible, and, never decay. However ‘solvent of matter’ is a strange idea. E.g. in a plasma (4th state of matter) nucleii can be separated from their electrons. However no subatomic particle can be absorbed easily by a nucleus. There are things like Coulomb barrier and Pauli’s exclusion principle. You have to do violent things to overcome that. ;-))
why is the coanda effect resulting in antigravity. thats like saying the casimir effect is responsibal for bananas.
just because the avro saucer and many other ordinary flying objects use this and it sounds cool and mysterious. start reading about it, before you disinform people…
you don’t have to go enrage on terminology. I’m sure people who really know the meaning of antigravity meant the ability to immune to acceleration even with a change in speed. Other interpretation just mean overcome gravity force, which I’m pretty sure the majority doesn’t consider antigravity. It’s no big deal.
Real anti gravity disrupts electrons, you can do this with electrical current or removing electrons creating ions, also sound and radio waves can achieve this, I have created real anti gravity in objects my draining electrons and by disrupting the electrons in structures with a current, it is a new field of energy and is related to time and space. If you don’t believe me go t make a magnet on scales and watch the weight change.
lol yeah i was about to say almost the same thing only a different metaphor
WHO IS COANDA? Coanda is a ROMANIAN,(the firs romanian) bulid a aircraft(the first aircraft in the world) . i am a romanian and i respect Coanda.If you dont belive me , search on wikipedia Henri Coanda.
This account is closed? Anyways, what is this guy talking about weight change of magnets? Plx explain.
# 1 @ :35 has been proven to be a water tower base.
Antigrav, by formal definition has not been accomplished. It may never be. Other technologies, in the future, will surpass it in effectiveness and practicality.
I think counter rotating propellers, on the same axis, with pitch differential control for yaw can be built easily today in the form of a saucer. larger/slower blades reduce noise, and standard heli controls for flight maneuvering. UFO!
Possibly rotating thrust pod forward too.
Above Top Secret (ATS) and C2C suppress the truth!! They banned me for talking about ___. watch?v=L7_ICeHmfWs