GM is going to close plants here in America and open them up in Mexico where they have no pollution controls, no employee benefits and they can pay the workers $1.00 an hour.
The North American Union is a Republican agreement with the word “Republican” stripped clean so it sounds like it’s bipartisan or “good for the America”.
The big federal reserve banks are actually super-Republican and will profit greatly as jobs are shipped to Mexico.
Does anyone know if the Caribbean countries or the Central American countries will be in the North American Union? I did a search but couldn’t find any information on it.
Libertarian means “no government” just that people do whatever they want, and whoever has more money does what he wants.
Libertarian is the same thing as the anarchist party. Basically the Republican party wants America to become Libertarian so the rich can do whatever they please without government controls.
I heard a Radio advertisement from Freto Lay here in Tulsa, OK and at the end of it they said quot,”Brought to you by the NORTH AMERICAN UNION”.
See how they are conditioning Oklahomans to get used to the NAU.
THEN a week later they changed it back to, “Brought to you by Fretolay Inc.”
Interesting. I doubt many Libertarians would agree that what they seek is anarchy, or the absence of government, but rather small government. For example in the US they want to keep the Constitution in tact, having the federal government provide an Army, and local governments police, roads, etc.
It also seems that the Democratic party is also pushing for further empowering the wealthy (at least banks), seeming to advance the same agenda as the Republicans. How do you see it?
The values promoted by most Libertarian parties is government is bad, that nothing should be supported or helped by the govt. If something is not working, then let it fail.
This is an “only the strongest survive” ideology which does not work with civilized people.
The 1st post office in the world was subsidized by the American govt. Most all technologies begin with govt money.
Europe’s industries are fine with govt aid each year. America has almost no industries left, due to no subsidies.
“Free market” could be in some ways construed as “economic anarchy” I suppose. However, that does not mean that the government itself would be anarchy, or non-existent. I cannot speak to Europe’s industries, as I do not read about their success or lack thereof.
However, I do know that when it comes to American industries, regulations on production have been blamed as much as a lack of regulation on non-industry business. In other words, government interference, rather than a lack of it.
I won’t lay claims as to whether the “free market” or the “subsidized market” are better systems. It does seem though, that you are trying to connect Anarchists, Libertarians, and Republicans all together with the wealthy elite; I don’t see that as being the case. Certainly the wealthy have desired a lack of regulations for themselves, but they also have been demanding subsidies, and lobbying for controls over other business. It has shared elements, but all together not equivalent.
GM is going to close plants here in America and open them up in Mexico where they have no pollution controls, no employee benefits and they can pay the workers $1.00 an hour.
The North American Union is a Republican agreement with the word “Republican” stripped clean so it sounds like it’s bipartisan or “good for the America”.
The big federal reserve banks are actually super-Republican and will profit greatly as jobs are shipped to Mexico.
Mexico today is libertarian (no government).
Does anyone know if the Caribbean countries or the Central American countries will be in the North American Union? I did a search but couldn’t find any information on it.
America still prodcues awesome firearms. Thats about it.
Canamex corridor is another part of the NAU as well as SMART Port and the Trans Texas Corriodor
“Mexico today is libertarian” How do you figure?
Libertarian means “no government” just that people do whatever they want, and whoever has more money does what he wants.
Libertarian is the same thing as the anarchist party. Basically the Republican party wants America to become Libertarian so the rich can do whatever they please without government controls.
YOUR PAPERS PLEASE!!
I heard a Radio advertisement from Freto Lay here in Tulsa, OK and at the end of it they said quot,”Brought to you by the NORTH AMERICAN UNION”.
See how they are conditioning Oklahomans to get used to the NAU.
THEN a week later they changed it back to, “Brought to you by Fretolay Inc.”
HEMP!!! AMERICA COULD PRODUCE SHIT LOADS __LEGILIZE CANNIBISHEMP// all drugs
LONG LIVE CANABISSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!
Interesting. I doubt many Libertarians would agree that what they seek is anarchy, or the absence of government, but rather small government. For example in the US they want to keep the Constitution in tact, having the federal government provide an Army, and local governments police, roads, etc.
It also seems that the Democratic party is also pushing for further empowering the wealthy (at least banks), seeming to advance the same agenda as the Republicans. How do you see it?
wtf, lol
The values promoted by most Libertarian parties is government is bad, that nothing should be supported or helped by the govt. If something is not working, then let it fail.
This is an “only the strongest survive” ideology which does not work with civilized people.
The 1st post office in the world was subsidized by the American govt. Most all technologies begin with govt money.
Europe’s industries are fine with govt aid each year. America has almost no industries left, due to no subsidies.
“Free market” could be in some ways construed as “economic anarchy” I suppose. However, that does not mean that the government itself would be anarchy, or non-existent. I cannot speak to Europe’s industries, as I do not read about their success or lack thereof.
However, I do know that when it comes to American industries, regulations on production have been blamed as much as a lack of regulation on non-industry business. In other words, government interference, rather than a lack of it.
I won’t lay claims as to whether the “free market” or the “subsidized market” are better systems. It does seem though, that you are trying to connect Anarchists, Libertarians, and Republicans all together with the wealthy elite; I don’t see that as being the case. Certainly the wealthy have desired a lack of regulations for themselves, but they also have been demanding subsidies, and lobbying for controls over other business. It has shared elements, but all together not equivalent.
hey does anybody know the name of the song at the begining?
rebel arms by immortal tech
a jew saying that must have a screw lose