DID A AIRPLANE HIT THE PENTAGON? LOOKS LIKE IT DID. WHAT DO YOU THINK? www.abovetopsecret.com
Ever hear of the
National Native Holiday?
Copyright NewsForNatives.com. All Rights Reserved.
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Not strange at all. It’s called physics. A plane going 500 MPH into a wall will vaporize on impact. Google Test videos of jets crashing into Cement walls at 500 MPH to see for it happen for yourself. It’s science not magic. You sir are an idiot or a liar.
Thats the exit hole. You have to keep your holes straight.
well obyiously the plane wasnt ridin on the ground nd hit it duh dunbassed it hit at an angle like the ones at the wtc. the shape of the hole would match that dont ya think
3 simple reasons.
#1 At 1:29 you can only see most of the rim in the center. Looks like 10 slots to me, but it is a very bad pic.
#2 Aircraft do not usually use the same rims on the front and rear. Do you know which ones are in which pics? Me either.
#3 None of those rim pics are labeled 757 as they are just meant to show what an aviation rim looks like.
Just goes to show how paranoid you Conspiracy Nuts are.
Sadly they still don’t make the whole plane out of the same material as the black box :(
THANK YOU!! These jackasses have never explained the extra cablammo super missile that blows up more than once and makes a cylindrical hole.
I know, and the Air Force is constantly putting missiles on airliners so they can shoot them into buildings as they crash because…….. Well, no one ever explained what effect tiny missiles would have compared to a massive jet hauling ass.
Think about the kamikazi. The planes did massive damage to armored warships and they were little prop planes doing much less than 500mph. They SANK ships with single engined prop planes. You know what was usually found? Engine parts, bodies or landing gear
In the drought of evidence and information….you are left with common sense and possibilities, So lets look at the actual facts…the engines of a 757 are 12ft long, 9ft in diameter, weigh 6 tons apiece, and are made from steel titanium alloy…with a melting temp of 3570 degrees…kerosene burns at a max temp of 1250 degrees…so common sense would suggest that the fire,s at the pentagon could not have vaporised the engines. (2) Its claimed that the 757 flew at about 15-20ft above the (pt2)
(pt2) and at a speed of around 500mph..covering a distance of about half a mile. According to BA technicians…to fly at that altitude and at that speed is impossible..Then we have the lost wings..and tail, these parts would not have entered the pentagon, they would have been broken off and parts of them would be visible outside, but most importantly…where is the footage from all the other cameras…why is it being kept secret, why not put a stop to all the speculation and show the damn tapes
Another nail in the coffin of the missile theorists. As if it were even necessary. Of course, the basis of the missile theory is premised on Loose Change, whose deliberately clipping of this witnesses account is definitive proof that their intent was to mislead. Amazing the robots who dwell here with nothing to do but slam others, offering no proof or research to support their missile theory, and refusing to look at the proof and research done by others establishing the aircraft.
The fireball is not consistent with the effects of a military
explosive. Military explosives detonate with a bright flash.
The pentagon is a big stone & concrete building,
aircraft are made of aluminum. A direct 90 degree shot
at 550 kts wouldn’t leave much , except the parts described
(Wheels,landing gear struts, Turbine disks etc.)
Thank you!
“If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don’t have to worry about answers.”
— Thomas Pynchon, Jr.
hmmm
You’re right, just show the tapes… it’s the Pentagon… you know there are lots of cameras. Just show us and get it over with. Also please do so without years of “weathering”… we’ll be happy with that.
This vidio keeps switching to a fire in some woods, I dont see woods in front of the pentagon or chain link fence, then it switches to shots an engine.. who knows where that is could be anywhere. and a firefighting team in front of a square door? with trees? and a collapse rescue team printed on his shirt, from? Give me live news footage of the crash, and the images they found.
@Theguildreport your 500mph is physically impossible by the way for that plane and at that altitude but you wouldnt know that not being bothered to research anything.
Basically the engines cant push enough air through to go fast enough
Please check your statements before spouting total rubbish and impossibilities.
If youre getting the info from the official report its total bullshit and can be safely ignored.
Im only concerened with what is scientically possible.
have a nice day
hahhahahaa Why would they say, definately not a global hawk. ahahahahahahaahahhahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahha. Beyond bugs bunny cartoon. Folks, youtube, “the pentagon bull shit” If you have the reasoning skills beyond a fetus you WILL see it was a global hawk. If not. just remember this….head out first and start breathing or the doc will rap you on the booty.
@Theguildreport …Even the entrance hole isn’t airplane shaped.
@zenoist2 Lol, so true. Theguildreport sounds like one of those governmental idiots trying to keep this a cover-up. …He probably is.
“You see the point of penetration — a circular hole — not an airplane shaped hole.”
A plane’s fuselage is round. Derp.
Theguildreport is a genius! This plane “vaporized” upon impact, yet left a 12 foot hole on the other side of the building. Uh huh… genius I tell ya! Knows a lot about physics, too.
cruise missiles do have wings durrr XD
seriously tho someone should track down these witnesses to find if theyre employed by the govt or cia or whatever
An airplane could NOT have penetrated the pentagon wall. The nose is the softest part of the plane. There would have been pieces of the plane and definitely the engine if a plane had crashed. The US pulled off an amateurish hoax, but the truth will soon be revealed.
I agree with previous post. Soft aluminum makes a hole in concrete reinforced with steel? WOW, what an obvious lie. W weld the Titanium rotors that are virtually indestructavble. How do you explain or should I say obfuscate that fact??? WHERE are they at??? A plane will lose airlift and drop fast to the ground so your “physics” law is badly violated especially when the jet had to “miss” the other thing befor it hit the bldg. Again, I ask WHERE are the TWO 9 foot titanium rotors at sirs? Where??
all these wintness’s and not one vid or pic!!! give me a break i aint that dumb