Okay, this is amazing, when and where can I get this installed on MY car.
I imagine cancer patients will be soon beating on this inventors door!
I hope he has better luck than Stanley Meyor who invented a way to fuel his car using only water, was offered a billion dollars for the patent bu oil producing countries and then was poisoned to death…. sigh.
Watch this video, John Kansas, while attempting to cure cancer (of which he apparently has had some degree of success in) has stumbled upon the ability to use salt water as a replacement for gasoline. in a nutshell, he sends radio waves at the salt water, then ignites it and it burns hotly for some time. incredible.
alternative fuel gas alternatives alternative fuel automobiles http://www.unspillable.com space solar power solar wind power solar technology solar panels
The Most Amazing Invention
The Most Amazing Invention
[..YouTube..] 1:51 lol that guy is hilarious
[..YouTube..] @mastertheillusion -Well i actually cured myself of terminal-cancer by eliminating all junk-foods and taking an intense regimen of Nutritional-supplements (vitamins, emzynes, minerals & distilled-water); –whilst nobody has ever been known to be cured by Rockefeller’s Big-Pharm. toxic so-called miracle-drugs! AMA is a nasty drug-pushing organization preventing doctors from being schooled in actual methods of curing disease; –for example the Sabin-vaccine has proven to be a total fraud!!!
[..YouTube..] i came here from a bong video
[..YouTube..] @AryanKnight
There is one problem here. There is no life style known to man that rids us entirely of the occurance of cancers. There are healthy choices, and methods to decrease the possibility by avoiding states known that show higher possibilities of cancer growth.
[..YouTube..] I guess the beyond exponential scale of energies at the quantum level isn’t considered in some peoples closed system view on the universe. So discounting it is a way to kill any vision of tapping into potential energy.. oh wait, sounds like a description of voltage just there. That is correct right? Is not voltage the potential difference of energy through any given system? Now we have a closed system paradox, how does gravity work through a void? Thermodynamics says – no way. Quantum effect?
[..YouTube..] -My Granddad invented the ubiquitous PopUp-LawnSprinkler (usPat.#2360203), and taught me the ropes in patenting, later helped start my inventors assistance firm INVENTECH here in SanDiego, Calif. in 1975. He advised i not get directly involved in other inventors ventures, -just do my ethical best to evaluate their invention as to its marketing potential; –and if it looks promising, prepare the best quality Pat.Application possible for their budget at about $6K presently! ~Robair 858/277-8899
[..YouTube..] -unfortunately the concept set forth here does violate the so-called laws of thermodynamics as to the amount of energy exerted vs. the amount of ultimate work achieved, –thus is not really worth more than the geeee-whizzz value being generated among viewers here. Moreover, there is already a cure for Cancers, it is found in avoiding unhealthy life-style in combination with proper nutritional-supplementation; –NOT in NWO arch-criminal D.Rockefeller’s Big-Pharm. toxic-drugs the AMA promotes!
[..YouTube..] God i hope we can start using salt water instead of fossil fuels
[..YouTube..] @Conrsz in terms of Chemistry NO. But it is considered an element ( classic element, as are Fire, air and earth. ) -.- Dont believe me, search it on google.
[..YouTube..] Such a smart guy. He found a cure for cancer, and solved the fuel crisis. How can he be so stupid as to call WATER an ELEMENT!!!!!
[..YouTube..] @PupuTheMonkey Hey cool comment, too bad the reason this is impressive isn’t because we all think it’s an infinite power source, rather it provides hope that we can find a source other than crude oil by which to power things like cars.
[..YouTube..] @puputhemonkey your an idiot dude its because of people like you that all of the worlds resources are being used up like toilet paper the point is not about the money its about what its using thats all people care about MONEY and its the reason so many good inventions such as this arent being used maybe if you thought about the long term effects of using other resources to burn such as fuel, oil, or other things this would seem like the most amazing thing in the world to you DUMBASS !
[..YouTube..] @Nils3OWN Paranoid? If that was the case the terrorists would already have it. But keep on believing that stuff. Make sure to wear your aluminum foil hat to keep them from reading your thoughts too. lol
[..YouTube..] Omg now humans will exploit the oceans
[..YouTube..] @PupuTheMonkey yeah ur right.. although, take the idea, and make it able to be manufactured cheaper/ use less power… its called technological advancement
[..YouTube..] this is an old tech i work with plastic packaging and using rf to heat the press heat and use fluerecant light to know if rf is working or not
[..YouTube..] if that was 2007 why is it not out now if it is 2010 ?
[..YouTube..] This only the first step and a prototype. Even if the power input/output ratio isn’t up to par I am sure one day it could be made to be. Few great discoveries are instantly applicable to consumer products. Often they must be refined, perfected and ultimately made cost effective.
[..YouTube..] You guys are idiots, it wont use up all the water on the planet, Its just gonna evaporate the water.
[..YouTube..] If this actually works… (doubt it) all life on this planet will die, i mean we will use up all water sooner or later… And then the plants will die, and then the animals and then us…
[..YouTube..] @PupuTheMonkey keep in mind everything might change in future
also this technology could get improved
[..YouTube..] lern the cancer thing fast i know some one with cancer and about to leave the world
[..YouTube..] ***READ AND THUMBS UP?***Am I the first guy to think of if a crazy ass terrorist group happens to buy a ( ?!?!?”??!”?!¤??!??) CAR. And takes out the part of the engine that makes the water go (KAPOOOOF!) and then build a mega-version of it, putting it in to a submarine and making the worlds biggest suicide-“bombing” to.. i.e Pearl Harbor? World War 3 is at the doorstep to humanity and a new weapon, a thousand billion trillion times more powerful than a nuke is about to be discovered? .. *Hmm*
[..YouTube..] @mrghantauke no just the us economy XD hahahahaha
[..YouTube..] @KarySanger
Hahahahaha, you learn that in grade seven. I think you’ve been playing too many video games…
[..YouTube..] it would be physically impossible to gain energy out of this system. the energy it takes to split the water is just as high as the energy you gain from the hydrogen flame. not considering the amounts of energy wasted by operating the radio frequency generator.
[..YouTube..] enough with all the nerdy comments. all i wanna say is THE ARABS ARE GOING DOWN!
[..YouTube..] why are we not funding this?!
[..YouTube..] that’ll make gas obsolete.
bye bye shell, and lets go to the ocean eh kids?
[..YouTube..] WHY ARENT WE FUNDING THIS!!
[..YouTube..] @drout0 Your right.
We can only hope.
[..YouTube..] the way it was presented in this video, it’s like the energy necessary to break water molecules is less than the energy generated by burning the resulting gas(es)
[..YouTube..] @schismsz Yeah, H2O is not electrically “neutral.” Like a molecule is supposed to be.
Water is polarized. At least that what they taught me :p
[..YouTube..] @samurphy the question is how much energy is involved on each side of the chemical reaction.
I really want to try this out :)
[..YouTube..] Anyone know what frequency were talking?
[..YouTube..] @KarySanger hahaha you fucking fail so fucking hard
[..YouTube..] @KarySanger lol? are you kidding me? dont fucking talk cause you dont make any fucking sense. he thought H2O was a molecule and i only told him it was a compound, get your shit together incompetent dumbass
[..YouTube..] @schismsz
Wow… the only thing MORE pathetic than playin teacher on the internet is when u dont know what the fuck ur talkin about. Please dont breed.
[..YouTube..] @PupuTheMonkey Lets not ignore what it was made for in the first place, to cure Cancer. We have many forms of energy that are proven other than Oil. I’d like to know if he is still working on the cure for Cancer…very intersting all the same.
[..YouTube..] @runejimmy1 you thought H2O was a molecule? H2O is a compound meaning it is made up of molecules from different elements (2 hydrogens+1 oxygen)
[..YouTube..] Wait!!! H2O is a element? i thought it was a molecule..
[..YouTube..] Wow, i am so naive to like this stuff, i am amazed at my own naiveness !
[..YouTube..] @Physicalworld You’re still misunderstading what he’s saying. It DOES take more energy to run the system than you get out of it. Thats also what YOU’RE saying. Since it’s not 100% efficient, you put more IN than you get OUT. You’re both right, you just misunderstand what he’s trying to say.
[..YouTube..] omg…….. Where in a drought and there saying all this crap about not enough water… this is just another way to waste it!
[..YouTube..] @samurphy no what Im saying is just that energy is neither created nor destroyed. So with that in mind. no system can produce an amount of energy greater than what is put into it without an amplifier. Pupu stated that “I’m willing to bet it takes more power to run the system than what you get out of it”.. Umm thats how physics works.. there is no 100% efficient system without an amplifier. I am agreeing that this is inefficient.. not denying it.
[..YouTube..] @saint7412369 You get a net positive out of an system powered by oil, no matter how efficient because there is energy stored in the oil. A system powered by the device in this video will ALWAYS be a net negative. There is no energy stored in water. it REQUIRES energy to split the water into a combustible material (H2 + O2) which is then recombined (burnt) to form water, but will NEVER EVER create more energy than was put in to create the reactants in the first place. This is a basic law.
[..YouTube..] @exitwound You’re missing Pupu’s point. There is no input of energy from this system. It requires energy. It’s like a lightbulb. If you put energy IN, it lights up, putting out heat and light, but you can never, in any way, recapture that light and heat to keep the bulb running. The power needed to make a system like this run would be more than you can ever get out of the reaction it creates.
[..YouTube..] @saint7412369 you don’t need carbon to burn, hydrogen alone is quite flammable. That’s whats burning here. The RF device splits H2O into H2 and O2 which then burns. But you can never get more energy out of the combustion than you had to put in to split the water. This device could be used in conjuction with Solar or Wind electricity to split water for use in hydrogen power cars, but keep in mind that the power is coming from SUN or WIND, not the water. The water/H2 is just storing the power.