Coast to Coast am mentioned by the caller is a good website; perhaps he was using the term my good friends the Rockefellers sarcastically. WW3 probably will happen because evil people in power at the moment probably sicken even themselves, so they seem to be on a suicide mission & they are going to take us all down with them. Evil is destroyed by forces beyond our control & because the human race is rife with paedophiles & Satanists a wipe-out may be necessary & inevitable see abeldanger net
It cant be that world war 3 will be stopped, that means someone is! trying to start it.
We now got the situation in the middle east exploding…
The American military setting up missile bases in Libya, where they’re now fighting one of many tirrans.
Now goin around the table with Israel to maybe launch missile or nuclear attacks on Iran which could be a nuclear threat…
Khaddaffi may not be the most sensitive guy, but socially he had a lot arranged for his people. Like education and health-care
@Aurinkohirvi I see your point, but I think Alex was right. Anyone with a ligitimate request to debate would have introduced themselves up front without being asked. This guy was a crackpot.
@Aurinkohirvi Wow, I always find the brightest people to respond to. If someone are asking for a debate on a radio show then it’s safe to assume it’s not a private/personnal debate but a public one. That being the case, anyone asking for a public debate is going to introduce themselves first without being asked to. He was a crackpot.
No, I don’t think the caller wanted to give his real name any more than other callers do. Invited come with names but audience calls come anonymous. Alex debbates with other callers, this one was disapointed Alex didn’t debate with him (on Coast to Coast obviously).
Maybe I have a blind spot. I fail to see what was the “nut” thing.
That he wouldn’t say his name? Most callers would not, I don’t think that’s nutty.
That he blamed Alex didn’t debate him? Alex does shuts up people all the time, if he doesn’t agree with them. People making comments here in YouTube blame Alex all the time not letting people to speak and cutting them off. So I don’t think that is nutty, either.
@Aurinkohirvi Yeah I know, I am one of those poeple that has chewwed Alex out several times for how he treats callers and interupts people, but this time he was right.
@Aurinkohirvi well: 1. Michael had nothing to debate about, HE NEVER ANSWERED HIM HOW HE WOULD PREVENT WW3. 2. Alex asked him MULTIPLE times to start the debate, you know what a debate is right!? But only flamewars, only blaming, no debate – that’s why he cut him of. RIGHTFULLY
@Aurinkohirvi you’re missing the point idiot: HE CLAMS ALEX WON’T DEBATE HIM – so he asks his name to remember if he EVER tried to aviod debate with him before?? Or else it’s just a LIE, Alex NEVER avoided him. To claim “you won’t debate me” if he never have had the chance before!?!?! LOL!
He was just answering Alex when Alex asked who he is. He was telling he tried to debate Alex when he was on Coast to Coast, but Alex would not listen him and started to talk over him, and then cut him off.
If Alex had actually let this guy speak, he could have told what they were debating about in Coast to Coast.
Coast to Coast am mentioned by the caller is a good website; perhaps he was using the term my good friends the Rockefellers sarcastically. WW3 probably will happen because evil people in power at the moment probably sicken even themselves, so they seem to be on a suicide mission & they are going to take us all down with them. Evil is destroyed by forces beyond our control & because the human race is rife with paedophiles & Satanists a wipe-out may be necessary & inevitable see abeldanger net
This is what happens when you close the insane asylums…
lol mike your a moron
start making sence guy
It cant be that world war 3 will be stopped, that means someone is! trying to start it.
We now got the situation in the middle east exploding…
The American military setting up missile bases in Libya, where they’re now fighting one of many tirrans.
Now goin around the table with Israel to maybe launch missile or nuclear attacks on Iran which could be a nuclear threat…
Khaddaffi may not be the most sensitive guy, but socially he had a lot arranged for his people. Like education and health-care
wotta nutta!
Whatisthis…
Idon’teven…
NEED more guns and roses after breaks!
fuck off dousche bag idiot
LMFAO this caller’s a nut! I want whatever he’s smoking, that’s for sure.
jesus christ….. i think it’s ‘Shock Of God’ that pathetic non christian hating weasel.. lmao
LOOK UP LAUREN MORET JAPAN
INFOWARS AND THE ALEX JONES CHANNEL
WELLAWARE1
AGENDA21
CODEX ALIMENTARIUS
THE ENERGY NON CRISIS
PRESSCORE DOT CA SEARXH HAARP AND SCALER WEAPONS
PLESAE WAKE UP SHEEPLE BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE!!!!!
Lol he called him BRAD HAHAH
This guy really should figure out what excact point he is trying to make before calling. He was all over the place.
Hey! Did that senial old man get out of the asylum agian? We need to up the security.
The caller was just telling he was trying to debate in the Coast to Coast, and Alex talks over him and cuts him off! And calls this idiocy.
@Aurinkohirvi I see your point, but I think Alex was right. Anyone with a ligitimate request to debate would have introduced themselves up front without being asked. This guy was a crackpot.
@Gnostic279
I think a person calling to the show, usually wants to be anonymous. They usually give a fake name when chatting with a radio host.
@Aurinkohirvi Wow, I always find the brightest people to respond to. If someone are asking for a debate on a radio show then it’s safe to assume it’s not a private/personnal debate but a public one. That being the case, anyone asking for a public debate is going to introduce themselves first without being asked to. He was a crackpot.
@Gnostic279
No, I don’t think the caller wanted to give his real name any more than other callers do. Invited come with names but audience calls come anonymous. Alex debbates with other callers, this one was disapointed Alex didn’t debate with him (on Coast to Coast obviously).
@Aurinkohirvi Please, just accept it. This guy was a nut. That’s why people take advantage of you. I see a little blind spot in you.
@Gnostic279
Maybe I have a blind spot. I fail to see what was the “nut” thing.
That he wouldn’t say his name? Most callers would not, I don’t think that’s nutty.
That he blamed Alex didn’t debate him? Alex does shuts up people all the time, if he doesn’t agree with them. People making comments here in YouTube blame Alex all the time not letting people to speak and cutting them off. So I don’t think that is nutty, either.
@Aurinkohirvi Yeah I know, I am one of those poeple that has chewwed Alex out several times for how he treats callers and interupts people, but this time he was right.
@Aurinkohirvi well: 1. Michael had nothing to debate about, HE NEVER ANSWERED HIM HOW HE WOULD PREVENT WW3. 2. Alex asked him MULTIPLE times to start the debate, you know what a debate is right!? But only flamewars, only blaming, no debate – that’s why he cut him of. RIGHTFULLY
@Aurinkohirvi you’re missing the point idiot: HE CLAMS ALEX WON’T DEBATE HIM – so he asks his name to remember if he EVER tried to aviod debate with him before?? Or else it’s just a LIE, Alex NEVER avoided him. To claim “you won’t debate me” if he never have had the chance before!?!?! LOL!
@clarkcolt45
He was just answering Alex when Alex asked who he is. He was telling he tried to debate Alex when he was on Coast to Coast, but Alex would not listen him and started to talk over him, and then cut him off.
If Alex had actually let this guy speak, he could have told what they were debating about in Coast to Coast.