Julian Assange is preparing to appeal a London court’s ruling that he be extradited to Sweden on sex assault charges. The founder of the whistleblowing Wikileaks website says the allegations are baseless and if he is handed over, he will not get a fair trial. RT’s Laura Emmett has been looking at why Assange is being extradited from a country which is home for many wanted on far more serious charges. RT on Facebook: www.facebook.com RT on Twitter: twitter.com
gaddhafi should seek asylum in the UK….
so he joined the mob, disgusting
he should has came to Canada,
We would have give him a free appartement and court fee paid by the gouvernement.
The problem is not with Julian Assange, Wikileaks or with the British Government but with the Human Rights Act 1998.
Introduced by New Labour with absolutely no idea of how far reaching this act would actually be. It literally over rules every single law created before or since, because a persons human rights cannot be infringed no matter what they’ve done.
A terrorist cannot be sent to Russia because of the risk to life and limb. Assange on the other hand is wanted by Sweden an EU member .
FAKE NWO
@LordLolinghamThe3rd Thanks! For a person who has granted themselves a grandiose title, your sentence is woefully short and being called an idiot by someone whose elevation to the peerage is self-created is a delihgt in which I take great pride. Don’t forget to powder you wig.
Man, I hate it when the media is used to scare the public. “We have terrorists amidst ourselves. Be careful. You are not safe at your home. etc.” They should also stop taking Assange’s case out of context to prove any dubious statements they have. In short: if Assange is not a true criminal, then a justice system that labels him as one under special circumstances should not be considered one. It is all about the constitution: if the law permits foreign influence to court rulings, it may happen.
@dangoat2009 TL;DR Faggot.
@LordLolinghamThe3rd I see your charm is as boundless as I imagined and you have mastered the use of acronyms but have not yet managed the proper use of the semi-colon. As for the use of faggot, you could at least put an adjective in front to make the insult more interesting in lieu of the ability to shout in fonts.
@zosozox You live in Sweden so you would know more about your fellow countrymen than I would. That said Assange may very well be guilty if he is so afraid to defend himself in open court.
@Sanorpas There is nothing logical about your statement. Simply put the man is afraid of defending himself in open court so logic dictates that there is some guilt present. It is illogical to assume that the United Kingdom, Sweden and the United States of America would waste time and money on a passing story.
@chairde Guilty or not – not the point! The point is you CAN NOT kill EVERYONE brave enough to say the truth! The history has proven that! Take a Vietnam – you killed a LOT but at the end of the day you get out with your tail between your legs! It’s going to be THE SAME in Iraq.. so why all that killing? Assange wants to show that shit to all of us, and you want to kill him TOO? It’s SICK, men! Why don’t you try to kill 1.3 Billion Chinese- your new economy masters? I would like to see that LOL
@zosozox Guilty or not is the point.
@chairde Well, we’re talking here a feminists DICTATURE state. About the “laws” of that DICTATURE state… we’re talking a moral and legal value of those “laws” from the perspective of FREE WORLD, a world outside Sweden! Outside those boxes male population in Sweden are forced to accept scared to death by the nazi system of Sweden. Mind you- ” Sweden is “The Saudi Arabia of Feminism” and if we CAN NOT accept everything that happens there, why should we accept EVERYTHING that happens in Sweden?
@zosozox Is Sweden part of the EU?
@chairde only if assuming that courts can be trusted, sorry buut… when judge says that he doesnt see possiblity of him getting send to US and possibly get life sentence? trying to say that judge “was at least thinking about it before getting to verdict” is a FAR ETCHED ARGUMENT. He just blurted out whatever he thought (or was insisted to think) at that moment.
well i guess he didnt want play there game,
the people behind this and anyone with hafe a brain knows who they are,
wanted too much or he didnt want deal with them,
so they slow him down untel he come to reason,
lol i wonder what they got instore for him next !
and game go on,i must say that was well done use his gay looks
people will believe that one cheers mate !
hes a sex pest
@Sanorpas The far fetched argument is saying that all the world is wrong and that is why he won’t defend himself in open court.
@chairde nope its saying that judge obviously was biased, like i said if he “didnt saw possiblity” then: a. is an imbecile and shouldnt be a judge. b. hes bought. theres no middle ground to assume that theres anything logical behind his words
DISGUSTING! This is so obviously a ruse because Julian’s genius website has dented the political ego of the true criminals [GOVERNMENTS] ….. I’ll keep asking this question:-
Why in the hell are Tony Blair & George Bush not behind bars????????
@Sanorpas That may make sense in some alternative universe.
@chairde sometimes i think that my internet IS indeed connected to one …
Now we know the full diminished capabilities of the elite…To have completely lost any moral fiber of their .
your news lives-on:
wwwf4wpeaceDOTde
danke-schÖn