FORGOT TO MENTION: i know i don’t respond to all comments, but i read and appreciate all of them, positive and negative. thanks for your support! police hazing: www.theindychannel.com the beating mentioned (not for suspected DUI, but for alleged disobedience): www.youtube.com www.youtube.com student beaten: articles.chicagotribune.com www.huffingtonpost.com cop shoots himself in the leg: www.youtube.com cuffed for doodling: www.nydailynews.com six year old cuffed, committed: www.wpbf.com amongst other rulings, warren v. columbia: en.wikipedia.org cops fail to protect 16 year old beaten to death: www.lewrockwell.com
but the Mafia does not wear stylish badges god damn it!
@Caveman135
hey there caveman
@6u6u7o
You still need to know how to defend yourself as the police probably won’t be there when you need it. Plus, now you also need to know how to defend yourself against the police.
Besides, nobody is against policing. We just don’t want tax paid thugs with a monopoly of power.
@6u6u7o
The “State” has effectively mad you like RICO and the way it operates,and ask for more of it by voting for it so it can be given moral sanction.The issue here is force,and they know it. If they quit using force they know that the market will phase them out.(Ringo’s Law)
Good shit cheese!
Man, I gotta agree with you on this. I’m always in a position where I refuse to believe cops are some of the biggest douche bags on the planet because I don’t understand how they can possibly be so incompetent and abusive, but they really leave me no choice.
@6u6u7o
No, padawan, it’s a very non-trivial problem. You directly made the following claim: “There is a need to have state police force so that we don’t have to know how to defend our selfs [sic].”
However, police have no legal obligation to protect anyone, and they are logistically unable to do so even if they want to. You’re backpedaling and trying to change the subject.
You’re also confusing having police with having a violent monopoly on police services.
@6u6u7o “There is a need to have state police force so that we don’t have to know how to defend our selfs.”
Holy Shit.
And how do you suppose they’ll protect you.?.. magically appear the moment you’re being assaulted? Don’t bet on it. Their main job is to investigate crimes – after the fact.
You need to learn how to defend yourself, because they aint yo daddy. They are not paid to – nor are they legally obligated put themselves into harms way for you or anyone else.
@6u6u7o Why is it necessary for us to not know how to defend ourelves? Moreover, why is it that we must be forced to pay into a system that presupposes that we aren’t able to protect ourselves, shouldn’t be able to protect ourselves, and that we shouldn’t have a choice in regards to what manner we choose to elicit protection? Starting off an argument with an insult is childish. Face up to the reality that you have been programmed not to question the power of the state. Step back and analyze.
Love your anti-cop vids.
Keep it up.
@6u6u7o So who defends us from the police?
Agreed. The failure and outright abuse that our police force exhibits is due to the monopoly on police protection that they hold. No conspiracy plots, no evil men trying to consciously do us harm. It is just simply the result of a monopoly.
@ignostic1
haha hell yes. i’m all for inventing new acronyms relating to cops. i’ve been trying to push ATP for a while now.
@TotalAnomy
absolutely. people reacted to that situation with a gun control attitude, rather than seeking to abolish state controlled schooling. get rid of compulsory schooling and i imagine that kind of thing would become nonexistent.
@6u6u7o
i believe that all the functions they perform can be replaced through voluntary patronage. when the threat of losing financing exists, it places a check on quality and price. people already pay the taxes which fund the cops, why not let them opt out and be able to choose from competing services, or just choose to protect themselves?
i think the existence of police, and the policies they enforce, like drug prohibition, massively increase crime and violence in society.
@Pentazoid111
doesn’t surprise me whatsoever. i also wonder how many of these 2nd and 3rd generation cops were beaten by their dads? my guess would be that child abuse is more prevalent with cops than in the general pop.
that’s great for the state tho….seems like abused and psychologically broken people are much easier to manipulate and control.
@junior00bacon00chee It’s not exactly new. Been around for decades.
With regard to the argument that some cops are “well-intentioned”. All that matters is the result of their existence. Their effect is always a negative. Whether it be through the stolen products of our labor, which are used to fund these thugs, or their coercive tactics employed to kidnap/abuse/murder, the world is an exponentially worse place for having legitimized that profession.
I realize you agree. I’m just venting.
@ignostic1
indeed.
9:07 lol “self-defence”… so true, so true..
@Squirelbutt Samuel Colt
@egokick
Well, they do. Read studies on it.
politicians cops and k-12 teachers all need to go to hell..
PARANOID, you said it, paranoid, they put my 68year old dad and 67 year old mom on the ground at gun point three blocks from their house when they happened by my dads business while the burglar alarm was ringing, they were shouted at in Spanish and forced to lay on the grown. my parents dont speak Spanish. paranoid pussies
@fudgedogbannana
dear god, i’m sorry to hear that. i mean, at what point does, ” you can’t be too careful” transition into complete insanity? i’d say get rid of the precedent that we owe these cops money, and let them convince people to voluntarily pay for their “services.” let’s see how long their “security” lasts then.
I say drug test ALL these pricks …….. I know MOST of the moral crusaders where I live are on steroids …….