Sponsor: NHLibertyEssay.com – A detailed acount of my experience after openly violating Keene District Court’s camera ban. This vid was first produced in early 2009. To buy …an ad like the one in this vid….email me RidleyReport at live…. period com. Ad rate details: nhunderground.com RidleyReport name of advertiser dave ridley report ron paul nh free state project libertarian new hampshire liberty forum john stossel second american revolution tyrrany thomas jefferson secession bureaucrat thugs states’ rights states us constitution porcupine porcupines amendment anarchist v for vendetta anarchism anarchy opppose stop new world order first amendment nonviolent non cooperation public defender defense attorney attornies outlaw puppeteering silly laws martin luther king mahatma gandhi rosa parks tibet russell kanning prison courtroom drama sentence law and order henry david thoreau david nwo politics rebellion political summons hearing arraignment sentence fine mall cop taser tazer don’t taze me cameras in the courtroom campaign for liberty dollar resistance protest demonstration demonstrators civil war opponents protesters alex jones civil disobedience / jail / court bro dont war on drugs freedom of the press barry cooper prison jail intimidation amnesty international kop busters blue light gang human rights watch ron paul new hampshire cameras in the courtroom keene free state project first amendment free speech crime department community service prosecutor outlaw …
“Lance”, who took your camera is also the one who put the cuffs upon Ian Freeman.
I wonder what he thinks of all this? Maybe he’d consent to an interview. Yes, he’s “just doing his job”, but maybe he would appreciate it if approached as a human being rather than a … a … “tool”.
Just a thought.
They took your camera phone? Private property cannot be taken without just compensation. Oh, I guess that only happens in a America that still abides by the Constitution! Someone send these cops to law school…
On April 13th perhaps you could present the court a bill for the price you had to pay to rent a camera and a phone needed to conduct your business. It appears you have been denied due process with the removal of your personal property. That should result in a judgement in your favor, court costs and even penilties. Maybe that is why the man was shaking. Check around to see who they did not arrest, did they discriminate or profile only you and your equipment? Nice work. AC
Classic. “Refused to use the cityhall pay phone because I was afraid some of money might go to the city” Made me laugh
Great work Dave!
I was wondering about the “legality” of that property seizure too. I was wondering what NH State statute(s) and/or regulation(s) gives the police (or any other related agent) the POWER to seize lawfully-owned private property and deprive the owner of its use. Is the camera-phone considered “evidence” of “disorderly conduct”?
If you’re lawfully exercising a First Amendment Right (freedom of the press), and then you’re charged with dosorderly conduct for exercising it, just how does that justify a property seizure (temporarily or not)?
Good point, indeed! Just where did this “disorderly conduct” law emanate from? This “law” could be applied so arbitrarily so as to make anyone fall under its violation! Maybe this is what local governments desire: A “law” they can stretch with broad strokes of the brush to indict anyone for almost any behavior, victimless or not. Victimless crimes MUST be wiped-off the Books for good. We’re allowing them to terrorize us at their whim.
It seems that “Disorderly Conduct” is a broad-stroke charge that can be applied by “the authorities” to just about any situation where they disagree with a citizen’s “conduct”. I’d like to know specifically what is considered “disorderly” about any citizen exercising an enumerated Right. I believe the way the police view that charge is that it’s a catch-all to allow them to arrest just about anyone simply on their personal judgment that someone is “disorderly” – whatever thats supposed to mean.