Plume emerging from ground level ahead of debris cloud, during South Tower’s collapse. Right-click & save to download DivX clip: xenomorph.s3.amazonaws.com Recommended 9/11 research: www.cooperativeresearch.org www.globalresearch.ca www.911research.wtc7.net www.ae911truth.org www.stj911.org 0x1a.com www.prisonplanet.com www.whatreallyhappened.com www.911blogger.com www.loosechange911.com www.911revisited.com www.nineeleven.co.uk www.wtc7.net www.journalof911studies.com www.patriotsquestion911.com www.wearechange.org http www.911disinformation.com
looks like the second “explosion” or what the hell it is… coming out of a car
or maybe.. its a bomb that felled out of
that thing thet felled down..
look at the thing explode and
taking with it sand from the ground
that looks more likea bomb
then anything else…
just keeping on doing that…
this coud be something they failed in
or maybe its a toilet that explodes?
…you know, to collect 7 billion in terrorist insurence, and con a nation into a profitable multi-trillion dollar illegal war. But Silverstein, and Rothchildberg would stomp on a baby’s head if they thought there was a dollar in it.
You have to blow the underground parking levels if you’re going to sink a builindg into it’s own basment…
That dust is being forced out of a underground parking ramp.
There was 7 underground floors under the WTC, mostly containing underground parking. In front of the bridge (where the dust comes up) was one of many entrances to this underground parking lot.
All the force of the collapsed pushed debris and dust through the underground floors and out of the parking lot entrances.
Has that ever been written in any official report document or are you just pulling that out of no-where. I’d like you to send a newslink, proving your claim.
And this is supposed to prove what????
So I guess the best way to blow an underground basement is to start at the 80+ floors?? Stupid logic.
collect 7 billion, but LOSE much, much more??? He still has to pay millions a year for the lease, with ZERO rent paying tennants. How is that financially savvy?
Very suspicious!
That’s interesting, but have you seen the giant plume coming from the ground BEFORE any of the buildings collapsed? It’s in the In Plane Site video (part 4/6 I think).
Does anyone know about that? In the vid, the guy says it only appears in one video from CNN I think and never played again. And there’s a still of it from another angle which has a Swedish caption.
It’s a giant plume north and west of the towers while they are both still standing.
the base of wtc had to be weaken that the tower can fall straight down … thats why they bombed the base
WTC Underground Parking West St Entry
@klmullins65 HE MADE 7 BILLION ON A 15 MILL INVESTMENT … IM SURE THE INTEREST ALONE PAYS HIS RENT DUH
@klmullins65 FAILURE
@MERCURHILLMANIAC , 15 million??? LOL Where in the world did you get that ridiculous information?? LOL You probably cant buy a McDonald’s for 15 million, much less lease some of the most valuable property on the planet for 99 yrs! Try 3.2 billion investment for the lease (which is what CT sites say). Now, he has to pay 120 million a yr for lease, X 10 yrs (so far) = 1.2 billion in rent. Add the fact that he still has to pay to REBUILD with insurance money. NO PROFIT! LOL
@klmullins65 ACTUALLY IT WAS 14 MILL OF HIS OWN MONEY THAT SECURED THE DEAL AND HE PAYS 120MILL A { M O N T H } WHICH IS A LOSE AND I BET WORKS AS A CONVENIENT TAX WRITE OFF EVERY YEAR FOR THE BILLIONS HE MAKES ON ALL HIS OTHER PROPERTIES AND VENTURES
@Klmullins65
When you look at the Silverstein investment at a superficial level and throw around uncertain numbers, it very well could seem as though lucky Larry got a raw deal with the whole 9/11 situation. But looking into it with an understanding of the angles emplyed by these people (wealthy people with experience in investments), you will find out that a lot of money being pushed around is on paper only.
@Klmullins65
That and at the end of the day, if Larry were to walk off with one billion dollars, that’s a massive profit. In the end, we can be sure Larry made a billion or 2 and got a brand new tower which will make him 3x what he would have with the twins. He’s probably selling office space as we speak.
Another thing to look into would be Silverstein and any of the demo/cleanup crews. I wouldn’t be surprised if lucky larrys name was on some list of contractors and corporations that made money off cleaning up the rubble. Perhaps even a nephews dumptruck….these guys are all connected.
@MERCURHILLMANIAC , it may be that he’s writing off his lease payments, but purposely destroying the WTC would not have been a profitable venture. The reason why Ground Zero is stiull sitting empty is because they cant agree on a design that is profitable enough for Silverstein’s group. Not so he can use it as a tax right-off.
@klmullins65 NO THERE IS NOTHING THERE BCAUSE IT IS NOT PROFITABLE YET..SEE MARKET!! HE WAS JUST A TURNA BLIND EYE HELPER..BELIEVE IT!
@AbuZubaydah I.E. EXPLOSIVES
People forget how rich people make money?it’s not just about the insurance and the rent, how big of a loan di you think you cab take out when you own the WTC’s? Silverstein takes out a 500Million dollar loan and makes all sorts of investments, buys other properties, etc. etc. It’s a lot easier to make money when you have money and these guys are geniuses with cash. There’s probably 10 ways he was/is making money off those buildings.
they just infiltrated and planted bombs in the building for an perfect collapse,looks more like a demolition