www.prisonplanet.com www.infowars.com Former Governor Jesse Ventura: WTC Collapse A Controlled Demolition Navy veteran and movie star savages official story, says media covering up truth about attacks Paul Joseph Watson / Prison Planet Wednesday, April 2, 2008 www.prisonplanet.com Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura vehemently savaged the official 9/11 story on a syndicated national radio show today, saying the WTC collapsed like a controlled demolition and was pulverized to dust as he also highlighted the impossible 10 second free fall speed of the towers. Appearing on The Alex Jones Show, Ventura said that his initial reaction to 9/11 was much like most people at the time, and he accepted the official story outright, a response he now regrets because he was in a position of power and could have used it to raise a lot of pointed questions. “I kicked myself when it initially happened that the light didn’t go off but I was so shocked that this thing had even taken place that I apologize for not being more aware,” said Ventura, adding that watching Loose Change at the insistence of his son was part of the catalyst for his wake up call. Host Alex Jones is executive producer of Loose Change (get it here), the most watched Internet movie of all time. Ventura said he ran through a rollercoaster of emotions when he saw the film. “When I finally did watch it I went through every emotion you could imagine, from laughing, crying, getting sick to my stomach, to the whole …
It’s sad to watch people kill their careers with this 9/11 quackery.
hmmm…. you obviously dont know many of the arguments. Watch fabled enemies, which relies on actual evidence from interviews with government officials and articles from major news sources, as well as government documents, and then get back to me.
I didnt believe in the conspiracy theories for a long time, even though I had seen the structual and scientific evidence. There is a lot of evidence the government actually did this and covered up a LOT though. look at evidence before you judge.
its sad you call it quackery without knowing a damn thing about it, and that you could be implying that speaking out for one’s beliefs is less important than their jobs. Please.
really? have you looked at what the other side has to say?
Yea and that skyskraper in china that was burning all day didnt collapse..right, fire melts that steel..right
youre a fucking retard
nice comeback
the steel part of it did collapse
and there was a toy factory a bridge and a builing in chicago that all collasped due to fire
is that a better comeback?
yea, better comeback if you think that skyscrapers have the same structural design as factories and bridges..sorry, they dont.
all you have to do is open your mind and listen to reason..its ok to question your beliefs.
It’s easyer to lie to 350 000 000 peoples when your in control than to lie to 1 or 3 peoples, It is scientificly prooved. The USA was looking desperately for a war, they are running low on oil, they managed a strike on their on soil, kill many peoples and today soldier’s still dying becaus eof their greed. Research how the jap invaded China before WW2, youll see what I mean.
I’m open to the conspiracy theory, but I’ve yet to hear anyone explain how the events DID occur on 911.
If you intend to debunk a theory, you need a detailed, convincing alternative explanation as to how it was done.
You don’t have to show what happened in order to dis-prove the governments conspiracy theory.
Barry Jennings was in WTC7 and was almost killed by an explosion. While he was trapped he heard several more.
Conspiracy theorists tend to ignore the OVERWHELMING evidence that supports the accepted theory.
To convince me, you need a convincing alternative explanation. Furthermore you need evidence to back it up.
I go with whatever has the most convincing explanation and supporting evidence.
Good for you.
Maybe someone should talk a little more about that overwhelming evidence. Whenever people talk about 9/11, the conspiracy people usually cite a lot more supporting evidence, while those defending the accepted theory basically just say “Our government wouldn’t do that!”
The point isn’t to offer another explanation, it’s to show that the current one has a lot of holes in it. After learning of the current explanation’s flaws, one comes out with the knowledge that it is not accurate, which is better than believing a flawed explanation simply because it was the one that was provided.
That’s like a Holocaust denier saying there were no gas chambers at Auschwitz, therefore the holocaust didn’t happen.
You need to do more that just poke holes in the current theory. You need to come up with an alternative theory that explains all the details even BETTER.
THat’s horrible logic. If a scientific theory is proven false, it’s false, even before another explanation can take its place. Just because you can’t explain something well, doesn’t mean you should just accept a shitty explanation for the sake of having an explanation.
Um, I agree.
But in this case, it HASN’T been PROVEN false. So that logic doesn’t apply.
It’s like pointing out gaps in evolution, and concluding evolution didn’t happen.
You need to provide a BETTER alternative explanation, because you’ve disproved nothing thus far.
Nobody can know all the details but it has been proven beyond any doubt by analytical chemists that nanothermite was used in the demolition.
Keep in mind that thermite is an exceedingly rare chemical substance and so to have it found in samples taken from the rubble shows inside job demolition.
Then realise that Bush’s brother was the person in charge of WTC security in the months leading up to the incident with reports of strange workmen working around the clock with “nondescript boxes”.
@karlkarlkarl1234 do you call that a detailed, convincing alternative explanation as to how it was done?
You sound like complete wanker.
There is full reports written up by engineers and architects explaining it if you want to read it. Whole books in fact.
How the fuck am I meant to explain it all in this little box? you dipshit.
@ plimbuff “OVERWHELMING evidence”
no.
Jesse: As an engineer, I KNOW 9/11 was a secret gov. operation. Why? Above & beyond all the facts you & others cite. The media had an Architect appear a week later explaining that since the building supports were aluminum – the plane fires caused collapse. HE LIED! In court Liars cover guilt. When this was brought out recently – the media rushed to claim that the STEEL was defective? Lied again! Unless you consider sawed supports with timed thermite “defective”?
i thought building 7 was 47 stories tall… he said 51. i could be wrong.